|
![](http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/icons/csc/1px.gif) |
Discrepancy with missing are all command |
![Previous](http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/icons/csc/navgen_arrow_left.gif) ![](http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/icons/csc/1px.gif)
|
Message/Author |
|
|
I am a newer Mplus user and can't figure out what is going on with my analysis. I have 330 cases without any missing data on the measured variables. When I include the following command code anyway "MISSING ARE all (-99);" it drastically changes the results of my chi-square goodness of fit test. I would like to not use the command, but I am hesitating since it seems to me that I should get the same results with or without that command. Is there an explanation for the discrepancy? Thank you! |
|
|
First, ask for Patterns in the Output command to check your missing data status when using the MISSING statement. Perhaps some of your variables have legitimate values of -99. If that doesn't help, send input, output, data and license number to Support. |
|
Back to top |
|
|